Zooplankton response to a phytoplankton bloom near South Georgia, Antarctica
A shelf site near the island of South Georgia was sampled during a spring bloom in January 1994. Chlorophyll a (chl a) values declined from 19 to 6 mg m-3 during the 8 d of sampling. The bloom comprised mainly long pennate diatoms and large colonies of centric diatoms; a 200 µm sieve retained over two-thirds of the chl a. Mesozooplankton biomass was high, 12.3 g dry mass m-2 within the top 200 m, and comprised mainly copepods. A series of Longhurst Hardy Plankton Recorder profiles showed that the numerical dominants (Oithona similis, Drepanopus forcipatus and pteropods) resided mainly within the top 20 m, whereas the large, biomass-dominant copepods had secondary maxima rather deeper within the thermocline. Diel vertical migration was not a feature of this community, being limited to metridiid and euchaetiid copepods. Gut fluorescence measurements on 7 large copepod species showed that all fed during both day and night, although guts tended to be fullest during afternoon and night. About 20% of chl a grazed by these copepods occurred below the mixed layer, thus representing a potentially direct export of carbon from the system via sinking faecal pellets. Algal carbon rations (% body carbon ingested per day) of mixed layer copepods ranged from 3% (Rhincalanus gigas) to 20% (small copepods). With the exception of R. gigas, these values from gut fluorescence agreed with independent estimates from the site following the decline of chl a during incubations in ambient seawater. Despite low clearance rates, ingestion rates (per copepodid) were at the upper end of recorded Antarctic values, suggesting food saturation. Calanoides acutus and R. gigas cleared diatoms (including the highly elongated 0.5 to 1 mm forms) at maximal rates. Metridia spp., Calanus propinquus and small copepods, by contrast, cleared dinoflagellates and ciliates faster than diatoms of similar size. The total mixed layer zooplankton probably removed <5% of daily primary production and <5% of protozoan standing stocks per day.
Details
Publication status:
Published
Author(s):
Authors: Atkinson, Angus, Shreeve, Rachael S., Pakhomov, Evgeny A., Priddle, Julian, Blight, Stephen P., Ward, Peter
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're okay with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRead more
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.